In contemporary physics theory such as the arguments given in blue text below there is much discussion of past and future and how in strictly topological terms one might form theories to account for telepathy, telekinesis, precognition and a variety of other, observed but anomalous events. One of the reasons these heated discussions occur ad infinitum is because an important component of material, interdimensional reality is missing from the physics topology.

There is a living energy substance which is utilized by the logos of events and destinies to form and actualize the shape of past/present/future and how this entire cosmic nexus  is perceived at any particular location in timespace.

One must conceptualize in addition to the familiar "blue text" arguments below n a tiny compartment in the atomic nucleus such as was symbolized by the original Kabbalists as the door of "D'Aath" on the stem of the Tree of Life. There is a subtle entrance/exit from the observed cosmos which we may consider "absolute" into a matrix of coding energy which is qualitatively different from that electromagnetic substance which we can materially perceive or know.

This "Fluidice" coding substance is alive.  Click here to order original "fluidice" papers.nnn

Or scroll past the blue & red text to reach the green text at the bottom of the page. But it is recommended that you also read the intermediate debate.

==E. Macer-Story==

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

"If the quantum linear superposition principle holds we can change the computational base states to phase-coherently blend future and past. However, post-quantum theory allows a partial breakdown of this strict linearity.  This leads of course to signal nonlocality, time travel and violation of the classical limit of the second law of thermodynamics - not surprising that these violations are part and parcel of creative consciousness, which is definitely not "unitary", "reversible", "invertable" etc.

So when we write eq. (1) we imagine the bundle of all possible paths connecting the two Super-Duper Space points "past" and "future".  We also imagine a third intermediate point "here-now" and form

<here-now|q>=  <here-now|past><past|q> + <here-now|future><future|q>

You can think of here-now as localized - a special kind of "soliton" unified field configuration."

--Dr. Jack Sarfatti

In a message dated 4/12/01 10:03:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Jack Sarfatti also writes:

>> Look at Crop Circle Patterns. Are they some kind of picture for near
>>
>> field EM configurations for Star Gates from the Masters of
>> Hyperspace in
>> the Universe Next Door? This is admittedly a half-baked really nutty
>>
>> idea, maybe not even wrong, I throw out casting the ET fishing net.
>> See what
>> Schrodinger's Cat will drag in?

Good Morning Jack--
     Heya come the Cat...right straight for the configurational energy ("fluidice") special cat-pleasing cue you have laid here...:-) You perhaps recall the motto on my fluidice.com site:"The cat cries out"...as I believe that the (living)material information observed has a destiny and volition independent of the observer.
      It is possible that the crop circles are examples of the hyperdense (small, near field) transduction process ("fluidice//traction fluidice") writ large for us cosmic toddlers to see and ponder.Like the large text in a Dick & Jane reading manual."See Spot run. See Spot chase Cat. See Cat turn & sock Spot in jaw."
     " O....it's a CONFIGURATION.Duh."
       I have described the possibility of an ADDITIONAL configurational energy in my writings on the "fluidice//traction fluidice" energy matrix/template model. I will be presenting some of this concept at the IEEE conference on Crete this July 2001. I think it's appropriate to do that presentation on the isle of the ancient labyrinth.
   Cheers--Eugenia Macer-Story
  

If you wish to read more about "fluidice compartments", skip to the end of this page.

COMMENTARY by Dr. Jack Sarfatti:
Hyperspace UFT makes the 4-spacetime interval compress and dilate because of the seven extra space dimensions. This is a breakdown of topology-conserving Diff 4 symmetry.  The 11 dim hyperspace interval is the new absolutely stiff rigid "invariant" physical object at the level of this higher Klein Erlanger geometry.

We are still, in 2000 AD, developing "Einstein's Vision"

(Wheeler's term) of a classical unified field theory AKA "UFT"

in which in addition to integrable path-independnet holonomic

topology-conserving symmetric connection parallel transport of

vectors (tensors and spinors) around closed loops in both

distorted manifold and locally flat tangent space

fiber in which the vectors are relatively rotated.

There are also anholonomic antisymmetric connection parallel

transports of vectors around closed loops in the

manifold that fail to close in the tangent space leaving

topology-changing multi-valued "spiral" or "helix" anholonomic

nontegrable path-dependent translational "gaps".

Hagen Kleinet, in  Berlin, shows how these new UFT effects are

analogous to topological defects of order parameters and

dislocations in crystal physics and the many-body problem

generally. Kleinert's topology-changing anholonomic

multi-valued tangent-space "super-tetrads" extend the holonomic

equivalence principle eliminating gravity at a point to

a neighborhood of that point. This is important for acceleration

free warp drive in which no g-forces are felt inside

the Star Ship for global faster than light travel locally on a

time like geodesic without using Star Gates.

However, this is still in context of an intrinsic 4 dimensional

universe. We are now beginning to understand how the

antisymmetric topology-changing connection field of
classical UFT is really the "foot print" or "projection"

of nonintegrable 10 dim hyperspace constraints folding,

crumpling, and crinkling the 3 dim visible universe we

are stuck inside of like Flatlanders in Abbott's parable.

Time is then the 11th dimension not the 4th dimension.

All of the above is classical and material.

We now come to "mental" quantum physics.

By "mental" I mean "qubits" and also

http://qedcorp.com/pcr/vigier/slides/vigier.htm
http://stardrive.org/vigier3.pdf
http://stardrive.org/25/
http://stardrive.org/Lilly/

Orthodox quantum theory, within the Bohm causal ontology

including both quantum wave and classical particle with

well-defined continuous though not differentiable path,

not only the wave as all the other interpretations do,

says that the wave is a rigid absolute!

Note Asher Peres's "quantum theory needs no

interpretation" is the "pragmatic interpretation" in

Stapp's language. In this regard the quantum wave of
qubits is like the rigid space-time of special relativity,

like Newton's absolute time etc. Sure, the quantum wave

distorts under a deformation in its boundary conditions

and under a change in its coupling to the environment.

That is not what I mean. When I say the quantum wave is rigid

stiff and absolute I mean it does not directly respond to the

motion of its "particle". There is no feedback control loop

between particle and wave in quantum theory. Also, it all

happens in configuration space where the "particle" is

really a complex system of classical particles and their

force fields including the 10 dim hyperspace geometrodynamic

field forming the visible 3 dim topology-changing

universes of the classical multiverse. Probability plays a

limited role. God does not play dice with the multiverse.

As the complexity goes up the role of quantum

probability goes down.

Bohm's Theorem:

The absolute rigidity of the quantum bit pilot wave causes the

uncontrollable local quantum randomness in entangled systems that

enforces signal locality, untappable quantum cryptography,

quantum teleportation, quantum dense coding, and quantum

computing.

Post-quantum theory relativises this quantum absolute in the

same way Einstein relativised his own special relativity of 1905

with general relativity of 1915. So, actually my method, is quite

conservative and mainstream, when looked at from the

proper level of the whole forest not the twigs on

individual trees.

Note, David Deutsch's "quantum multiverse" is not same as

the "hyper-verse or material multiverse". David is talking about

the mental "wave" that the material 10 dim

hyperspace surfs or rides on. More on that later.