CLONING OF SIGNALS IN CONFIGURATIONAL TIME
Here we have a dilemma which is being discussed in modern physics. In order to be viable for transmission non-locally, a signal must be duplicated into some undefined matrix coding. When this happens, does the signal lose some portion of original content? This dilemma can be understood in terms of heredity and the DNA coding of characteristics, as an analogy. Here below is the author of the Fluidice website with her gradfathers Macer and Great-Grandfather Johnstone .Both Grandfathers had both musical & scientific ability. Both also had some knowledge of the healing arts & spiritualism. as seen in the photos below the following text--which are copies of the photos below this paragraph--the DNA signal can register as BOTH Eugenia Macer-Story AND Jean Ann Johnstone-Macer (Story) depending on the CONTEXT of your observation.
Johnny Johnstone, dancing, circa 1870 Warrick County, Indiana
C. G. Macer circa 1890 Mandolin Band--Evansville, Indiana E.Macer-Story 2001 Aquarius Rising--Woodstock,N.Y.
In a message dated 12/28/2001 11:42:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,physicist sarfatti@well.com wrote as part of an email dialogue::
The
no-cloning theorem is thought to prevent the use of quantum nonlocality
entanglement for stand-alone command-control-communication (C^3) both faster
than light and backwards in time from future to past as actually seen in human
brain pre-sponse retro PK by Dean Radin and Dick Bierman.
Strictly speaking the no-cloning theorem is formally correct. The problem
is that it does not ask the relevant physical question.
[E.Macer-Story]
Here I think the issue should be "cloning of signals"
rather that "cloning of quantum states." My interest is in the
communications aspect, how information is conveyed from future to past/present
and past to future.present. The reason I am developing my "fluidice"
model is simply that--naive of this exact notation--I realized that one would
need an additional energy/substance matrix to imprint (clone) the eigenstates of
e/m matter in order to signal the information in a configrational way, outside
linear time.
I do not think the non-local signals are exact copies.
Sometimes they are bad or wierd translations into a particular local context
from eigenstates of another local context with radically different particular
characteristics. For example: emotions sent from a Martian to a resident of a
planet circling Zeta Reticuli or the thought of an automobile sent to Jupiter
where sentient crystals percolate fluently in hot lava.Likewise: thoughts sent
between radically different cultures here on Earth.So if one accepts the idea
that molecular structuring is also coded or "cloned" in the fluidice
matrix, an "apport" or sudden appearance of a "signaling
object" from fluidice matrix space will not manifest invarient, exact
shape. It will manifest the shape which is possible or comprehensible in the
local space into which the material signal is arriving.Example: a FAX which is
auto-translated and a different size but conveys the message.
C.G. Macer c.1890 E. Macer-Story--2001 Johnny Johnstone c.1870 Jean Ann Johnstone-Macer (Story)-2001
For a contemporary view of the stringed instrument as illustration
of the Fluidice mass/energy matrix model , go to the Fluidice Home Index Page.
OBJECTS EXISTING IN TIME ARE COMPLEX NUMBERS.
LIVING OBJECTS EXIST IN TIME.
THEREFORE LIVING CREATURES ARE COMPLEX NUMBERS.
COMPLEX NUMBERS CANNOT BE FINALLY RESOLVED IN SERIES.
THEREFORE LIVING CREATURES ARE NOT FINALLY RESOLVED IN TIME.
--E.Macer-Story
We are partly the complex product of our hereditary DNA mechanism,
partly the individual intelligence which incarnated into that mechanism
& inevitably part of the specific circumstances of each, particular lifetime.
In a
message dated 4/10/01 11:23:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, L. Crowell writes:
[L.Crowell]
In particular in classical mechanics the notion of
> time exists because there is a clock that exists outside the system. With
> general relativity there is no such external clock to a cosmology. Time is
> then a measure of the diffeomorphism of the spacial surface and this can be
> reparamerized arbitrarily. In this manner time can be thought to
> "disappear" from cosmology
[E.Macer-Story]
I am writing a play entitled ARS CHRONICON SILVESTRE--set in the year aprox.1000
A.D. in Eastern Europe and involving concepts of time, as Pope Sylvester was
said by the Roman Church to have invented the pendulum clock.I had mentioned
this play in process to you (Crowell) previously. So I have been thinking about
mechanical concepts of time. I disagree that the mechanical clock in
"outside the system". Rather, it is INSIDE the gravitational situation
of the solar system wherever. One can expect that a mechanical timepiece would
run differently on Mars than on Jupiter.Particularly, this thing of wheels and
gears would run very differently on a planet found somewhere in the
constellation Bootes.So the mechanical timepiece is "inside" a
cosmological system.
Your concept of time as "diffeomorphism of the spacial
surface" of course refers to molecular pulsing, a characteristic of 4 dim
matter which can become coherently different upon the occasion of a
gravitational quantum shift ie:alteration of the Planck length within a bounded
area of timespace.It is particularly important, thinks your Interlocutor
Macer-Story,that this "quantum gravitational shift" be conceptualized
as within a bounded or limited area. There cannot be a quantized gravitational
characteristic which partakes of any infinite structural quantities.
Hickory Dickory Dock
The Pope ran up the clock
The clock struck One
The Pope was gone...
What shall we tell them now
In Babylon?
Respectfully yours-- Eugenia Macer-Story
In a message dated 12/16/00 9:03:47 PM Eastern Standard Time E. Macer-Story writes:, Thanks, Gary-- You were correct. I did enjoy reading the lectures by Chaitin. It is interesting that he grapples with the finite/infinite problem in computation. For, as I wrote to Jack& Ira earlier today, I am moved to interject the problem of the "impossible infinite" into discussions of physics theory which are using the standard " As the X approaches infinitely small...or large..." I simply have not found the jump toward "infinity" as a solution to be adequate. In fact, I think that Chaitin recognizes this when he stresses that in the final number of a series it is not possible to know <0>//<t>.. My thought on this problem is that therefore when solving physics rather than mathematical problems it is necessary to use a limited sample, acknowledging the limitation. Sorry my keyboard does not have math symbols or I would be using the matrix sigma summation notation here. Anyway, see below from Chaitin. Interesting that he also publishes in Spanish as I read Spanish. Best--Eugenia Macer-Story ____________________________________________________________________ C.J. Chaitin: I think that the work I've described, and in particular my own work on randomness, has not spared the whole numbers. I always believed, I think most mathematicians probably do, in a kind of Platonic universe. ``Does a diophantine equation have an infinite number of solutions or a finite number?'' This question has very little concrete computational meaning, but I certainly used to believe in my heart, that even if we will never find out, God knew, and either there were a finite number of solutions or an infinite number of solutions. It was black or white in the Platonic universe of mathematical reality. It was one way or the other. I think that my work makes things look gray, and that mathematicians are joining the company of their theoretical physics colleagues. I don't think that this is necessarily bad. We've seen that in classical and quantum physics randomness and unpredictability are fundamental. I believe that these concepts are also found at the very heart of pure mathematics. Future Work: In this discussion the probabilities that arise are all real numbers. Can the probability amplitudes of quantum mechanics, which are complex numbers, be used instead?
Talismanic paintings and hanging sculptures by E. Macer-Story are available from info@fluidice.com
These are a contemporary form of "interdimensionalist" art which uses aesthetically pleasing forms to incorporate
the traditional talismanic energies into contemporary artistic creations.
Below is ELF 1999 by E. Macer-Story. Acryllic on canvas. Below ELF is a discussion of interdimensional interference
with research into the supernatural and unexplained phenomena..
ELF painted by E.Macer-Story 1999.
Below is the cover of the Spring 1977 issue of PURSUIT magazine which contained the original "Fluidice" article.
This cartoon of the "inexplicable creatures" was designed by artist Britton Wilkie who drowned accidentally.
One item worth note here is the strange fate of editors connected with this publication directly after the death
of founder Ivan T. Sanderson, author of the classic anomalies book INVISIBLE RESIDENTS.
See commentary below:
In 1998-2000 E. Macer-Story was having trouble with people leaving odd talismanic twigs and other sorcery debris around her house in Woodstock
and sometimes also at the "MAGICK MIRROR" studio in Manhattan. She enlisted experienced psychotronics practitioner Neil Boyd to help her with
a diagnosis of this situation and here is his finding.
Subj: IS THIS A MAN CONNECTED WITH THE "BLACK MAGICK" CULT
WHICH WAS REPORTED AS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL
EDITORS OF PURSUIT?
Date: 3/14/00 10:04:44 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: rnboyd@mip.net (Robert Neil Boyd)
To: MagickMirr@aol.com
Howdy!
Your protagonist lives almost exactly to your left,
relative to your facing and location in this picture.
It seems that this picture was not taken near your home?
This appears to be a lanky dark-haired man in his
thirties who fancies himself a wizard. He is a sensitive
in the emotional realms, and is monitoring your
conditions remotely. His image of himself has a beard.
On some occasions he wears glasses. You have seen this
man at some public event, where he noted some kind
of weakness in your emotional structures and decided to
take advantage. He is arrogant and somewhat cruel. He
considers himself superior to the majority of humanity.
And in his emotional perceptivity, he is, to some degree,
superior. He has some streaks of compassion, however,
which he has in place as justifications for his behaviors
towards you. He thinks, for some reason, creating difficulties
for you is helping the world in some manner. (Don't ask me!
I don't get it!)
The air element will assist you a great deal in countering
his influences. Try each day to put attention on the sky
and the clouds, the stars, etc., for at least 15 minutes.
You should find that this alleviates some of the pressures
for you. Also, it is important to stay grounded, and to
surround yourself with Yourself. In other words, remain
cognizant of your heart as being You, and project this
to fill your space.
I am setting up a psychotronics system today which will
further impede his interferences with your designs. This
will simply generate a balancing condition which will require
a large effort on his part to overcome. Probably so large
as to make it not worth the bother. I will leave this setting
on the system for one week. You will inform me of any
progress?
Best Wishes,
Neil
Go to http://www.magickmirror.com
and scroll down to links to the MAGONIA magazine archives
to read the articles THE PHILOSOPHICAL DOUBLE CROSS by E. Macer-Story
and THE ART OF MAKING WOLVES FROM HUMAN SKULLS by E. Macer-Story
which contain a different view of the same
"sorcery" situation..