FLUIDICE ENHANCEMENTS

 

   I want to make clear that when I speculate that the matter density shift (K) which takes place via "fluidice" transduction at the atomic nucleus is "quantized" I do not mean exactly the same situation as the "vertical quanta" of the atomic orbitals.The density shift(K) establishes a "horizontal quantum" coherence which preserves the vertical quanta. A variety of locally-coherent "horizontal quanta" are possible.

HERE BELOW WE SEE THE NEWTONIAN (f=ma) SYSTEM LIMITING RATHER THAN FACILITATING UNDERSTANDING THAT "gravity/inertia" MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY GRAVITATIONAL. There is much more to the mass situation than acceleration up><.down or pull to><from. Inside the little bubble-balloon of the atomic nucleus, there is a non-electromagnetic expansion<>contraction force which can act against the surrounding G or mass-coherence/inertia in the same way that the gas in a balloon or submarine device can cause an object to float or sink. Atoms are thus small interlinked bubbles with simultaneous non-local trigger valves in the nucleus which follow a seed pattern of subtle coherence via  the [fluidice//traction fluidice] matrix.                 --E. Macer-Story

In a message dated 4/18/01 11:13:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Nilanjan Chatterjee writes:

 Thanks EUGENIA ,

       A malfunctioning elevator going UP , causes vertigo , that is well explained.

   It is normal reaction of floor on the person (force - up) exceeds the grav.pull on

   her/him (force -down) , causing a neuro-physiological response - Vertigo.

   But the 'anti-g' you write is truly mysterious. Only somewhat 'anti-g' effect 

   that physicists' know and speak of comes from the - Cosmological Constant; 

   /\ ( Lambda) which is 'some sort of quantum-vacuum-effect' . It works against

   gravity . It's formula :  force :-   F = /\ r m c^2 .

    where , m = mass of the repelled object , 

                    r = distance from the repelling body ,

                    c = speed of light ,

                   /\ = Cosmological Constant , value ~ 10^-53 meter^2 .

But , effect of  /\  on our brain is very much unknown . Though /\ is very feeble ,

there could be some places on earth ( Earth - Chakra ) , I speculate ,where this 

feeble value may get amplified by an unknown factor . This would particularly

happen if one considers short ranged "Salam Bio-gravity" instead of ordinary

Newtonian one .

                                                                                                              Best,    Nilanjan

BTW : 'Vertigo' brought to mind that famous - Hitchcock movie . - N  

         
Hi Nilanjan--
   Thank you for this formula.I may cite your response somewhere in my writings as a lambda mark appeared on my forehead in one photo taken by my assistant Louis Acker in an "earth chackra" area of the Catskills.This lambda photo is published in my "Fluidice: A New Thory of Interdimensional Transduction" which was in the U.S. Psychotronics Proceedings July 2001 and will be in the International IEEE-Crete2001 conference proceedings this year.
   Possibly, Advanced Intelligence was citing this lambda equation OR--as Sarfatti might argue--you would specifically link this formula to the "earth chackra" expeditions in the future.:-) In my paper, I simply say that lambda is the symbol for "wavelength"--which is also the case.
  Best—Eugenia

Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:56 PM

Subject: Re: On Bohm, Buddhas and Bubbkas--time & macroscopic dependence--variable g

  In a message dated 4/18/01 6:33:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
Nilanjan Chatterjee writes:

Could you please elaborate on " anomalous gravitation " you referred to .
 Is it some change in value of 'g'(acceleration due to gravity ) to some
area on
 Earth , that can not be 'computed' using any known formula of physics ?



Hi Nilanjan--
    Yes. It is fluctuating g & some force one might call anti-g. Each area
is slightly different. In some of these geo-areas water runs uphill . In
other areas there is a strong g which causes vertigo of the sort people
experience when in a malfiunctioning elevator going UP fast.
     Best--Eugenia

A concept advanced in this brief section from the original text, copyrighted by author E. Macer-Story in 1978, is extremely important to understanding both psychokinesis and "creative visualization". However, the use of the word "prana" and the term "prana per square inch" may not simply be confusing in the light of "prana" as a mystical concept utilized in Yoga teachings but may actually be inaccurate when non-organic material structures are being considered. Therefore, the concept of "traction fluidice" has been devised to account for the action of "fluidice patterning" on the electromagnetic continuum in a way which is independent of linear time. See the paper FLUIDICE: A NEW CONCEPT OF TRANSDUCTION (2000)available in secure Adobe file from  info@fluidice.com.

The basic concept under discussion is simply that the "energy of thought" is an actual force which occupies material space in the form of shaping ratios. Intelligent life from another planetary system or from another coherent dimensional continuum of this planetary system may have a different, innate "traction fluidice" capacity than the familiar, human esp/pk capacity.

Subj: Re: relativity & /er....the misgivings of Poincare & Lorentz
Date: 3/16/00 7:54:21 PM Eastern Standard Time 
a message dated 3/16/00 5:51:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, Paul Zeilinsky writes:

<< Viewed through the optic of today's orthodox methodology, it is
> indeed hard to see why Einstein is credited with the discovery of
> "special relativity". But I think this says more about the deficiencies
> of contemporary orthodox thinking than about Einstein.
> >>
Good Evening Paul--
Possibly Einstein is credited with the discovery of "special relativity" simply because his contemporaries more clearly understood the misgivings of Poincare,  Lorentz et al in endorsing completely the idea of retative intertial frames within which the speed of light is identical. A quote from Poincare: " We have no direct intuition about the [absolute ] equality of two time intervals." Poincare does not say "absolute" but Macer-Story adds this in brackets to explain the misgiving about relative intertial frames.
A quote from Lorentz:"...the daring assertion that one can never observe velocities larger than the velocity of light contains a hypothetical restriction of what is accessible to us, a restriction which cannot be accepted without some reservation..."
My view is that the acceptance of Einstein's theories was an important part of our collective evolution but will be proven to be--as Lorentz & Poincare intuited-- simply an astute observation limited by our ability, both intellectual and observational, to completely perceive our surroundings.
As our lenses got better, our view of both the solar system and microbes changed immensely. So why not the same with clocks and time? Molecular pulsing CHANGES FREQUENCY within varying gravitational situations.
--E. Macer-Story 2000