INTERLINKED SMALL EFFECT OF TRACTION FLUIDICE VIA ATOMIC NUCLEUS WILL GUIDE THE MACROSCIPIC EFFECT AS IN THE GROWTH PATTERNING OF A SEED.--E.Macer-Story

Subj: Re: implicit p-branes--hypersurfaces

In a message dated 12/28/00 3:43:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, R Kiehn writes:
[RMK]
<< ideas of generalized implicit
> surfaces should have application to the study of p-branes of implicit
> hypersurfaces that can have multiple
> components. The theory suggests t >>

COMMENTARY by E. Macer-Story

Yes. In one of my monographs entitled ON THE POSSIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL SURFACES I discuss in general terms the possibility of additional surfaces formed by the alteration of matter density (i.e. photon speed) in areas where there has been anomalous activity of some sort. This is formulated in macro terms and is based on my observation of atmospheric disturbance and/or anomaly in "earth chackra" areas or accompanying extreme claims of UFO and/or spirit contact experiences.
"It was a dark & stormy night. Diracula approaches...Diracula remarks:
"The M-boxes "Before Diracula" and "After Diracula" have slightly different photon speeds. This cause electrical disturbance and possible atmospheric temperature inversion effects,"
Best--Eugenia Macer-Story

Subj:    Re: implicit p-branes

Date:    12/28/00 3:43:06 PM Eastern Standard Time

From:  (Jack Sarfatti)

To:       RKiehn

Thanks

"PDE’s"??? Partial Differential Equations ????

  "This effect, like the Bohm-Aharanov effect, does not depend explicitly upon the

field strengths, E and B." does this act like exotic matter of negative energy

density to keep a wormhole open? How much energy does it take to use this effect

to prevent collapse? Is there any analogy here to Josephson AC tunneling?

 

RKiehn2352@aol.com wrote:

 

> Abstract: A formal correspondence is established between the curvature theory

> of

> generalized implicit hypersurfaces, the classical theory of electromagnetism

> as expressed in

> terms of exterior differential systems, and thermodynamics. Starting with a

> generalized

> implicit surface whose normal field is represented by an exterior

> differential 1-form, it is

> possible

> 1.  to deduce the curvature invariants of the implicit surface independent

> from a

> symmetric metric constraint,

> .

> 2. to construct a globally closed charge current density in terms of the

> properties of the hypersurface,

> .

> 3. to construct the exterior differential systems that include the PDE’s of

> the Maxwell Faraday equations and the Maxwell Ampere equations,

> .

> 4. to demonstrate that the interaction energy density between the potentials

> and the induced

> closed charge current density is exactly the similarity curvature invariant

> of highest degree

> (N-1) for the implicit surface, and then

> .

> 5. to show that this interaction energy density, the adjoint curvature

> invariant of the implicit surface, and the thermodynamic internal energy

> density of an evolutionary system subjected to a process in the direction of

> the charge current density, are all formally equivalent.

> .

> These curvature-energy density relationships are formulated without utilizing

> the constraints of metric, connection, duality, gauge constraints,

> constitutive relations, or an Einstein Ansatz. Although developed without

> direct contact with M-brane theory, the ideas of generalized implicit

> surfaces should have application to the study of p-branes of implicit

> hypersurfaces that can have multiple

> components. The theory suggests that gravitational collapse of mass energy

> density could

> be prevented, if not compensated, by interaction between charge-current

> densities and

> electromagnetic potentials. This effect, like the Bohm-Aharanov effect, does

> not depend

> explicitly upon the field strengths, E and B. Such a possibility appears to

> have been

> neglected in metric based curvature theories.

>

> See

> http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/gravaj.pdf

>

> Regards

> RMK 

Subj: Fwd: more strong stuff---"Heavy Ether"? "Fluidice"
Date: 2/17/01 7:34:06 AM Eastern Standard Time

For your amusement. But something liker this might make good publicity for the product. None of the product specifics have ever been published.
Best--Eugenia Macer-Story
-----------------
Forwarded Message:
Subj: Re: more strong stuff---"Heavy Ether"? "Fluidice"
Date: 2/17/01 7:15:58 AM Eastern Standard Time

In a message dated 2/17/01 5:56:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, Jack Sarfatti writes:

<< simply reported a fact. You jumped to conclusion I was "impressed". I
never said that. In fact, quite the opposite, I realized that these guys
don't know anymore than we do about the physics. What they do have is some
powerful math techniques. They admit they do not know what controls R
hence G*. I talked quite a bit with David Gross after his lecture. He is a
nice guy, honest, and admitted they are groping - which is good. It's up
for grabs. Whole new ball game re: extra dimensions and more. Table top
experiments in gravity very important. >>
Good Morning Jack--
I never thought you were impressed when yiu mentioned the AAAS meeting. Even E.Macer-Story has presented at the AAAS--on "earth chackra" areas.Got some interested responses then,BTW. My article "Heavy Ether" which was first published in PURSUIT magazine in 1980 was expurgated by the editor because I mentioned the effect of e/m fields & gravitation on perception, theorizing about the altered Serotonin release and perceptions experienced by persons in "earth chackra" areas containing large bodies of water. (Like the Great Lakes, the Pacific ocean, etc:-)) That editor, who openly chatted about visiting CIA offices in New Jersey. was relating to my material as if it was "dangerous".
"Some people" he told me,"Might try this."
I was angry but I let them remove the sections on ionization and consciousness. One decade later, Borderlands magazine--then edited by Tom Brown--published the unexpurgated "Heavy Ether".
Yes. Gravity gets very heavy inside the nucleous of atoms and I think that this has something to do with the added energy factor I have calkled "fluidice".It's not just gravity that pulls/expands the micro/4 dim structure.
My only comment is that at one time the CIA took these E. Macer-Story theories seriiously enoiugh to find them "dangerous" and attempt censorship. Why? I was suggesting people try what Jack refers to as "table top experimentation" with these coincepts. Real stuff. That's what I do when I experiment in the "earth chackra" areas I visit for experimental purposes. Real stuff. See: "Fluidice:A New Theory of Interdimensional Transduction".US Psychotronics Assn. Proceedings 2000.
Best--Eugenia Macer-Story