FLUIDICE ENHANCEMENTS

There is a basic conceptual problem with the equations appended below this brief initial exchange. Various attempts to embody cosmic process in a variety of physics systems is incomplete. It is my opinion that the living fluidice transduction substance, or mind pilot fields, are actually active via the atomic nucleus so that some of the hyperspace activity cited below in terms of wormholes and vortices is extremely small, but non-locally linked by a "fluidice" information matrix additional to the electromagnetic continuum.. Note the Greek translation after the technical physics commentary. This was a slipped surveillance tap. I'm not sure what it says. If you speak Greek, let me know. If you are more interested in E. Macer-Story's commentary on REPTILIAN CHAUVINISM than in the following discussion, simply scroll down until almost the end of this page. Although certain statements in the following dialog with Dr. Jack Sarfatti move in a loop, addressed to an academy of one on one, yet to omit these mathematique attempts to explain the vast mysteries of cosmic space because the author is an unconventional person addressing an invisible academy  is profoundly chauvinist. So here is the wormhole view. Judge for yourself.

In a message dated 5/22/01 8:42:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, sarfatti@well.com writes:

Subj: Re: Hyperspace Engineering Physics 101 at Star Fleet Academy High School
Date: 12/9/00 1:27:02 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: sarfatti@well.com (Dr. Jack Sarfatti)
To: sarfatti@well.com (Dr. Jack Sarfatti)


Feynman's treatment of the electromagnetic AC Josephson Resonance Effect
(Vol III 21-9) as the conceptual archetypal template for a macroscopic
quantum Star Gate between different visible universes (or,
alternatively, different parts of the same anholonomically crinkled
visible universe) in the hyperspace multiverse.

Two superconducting regions 1 and 2 separated by a thin
nonsuperconducting barrier.

The superconducting tunneling current density across the barrier is

j = 2(H12/h)( )^1/2 sin& (21.44)

H12 the coupling Hamiltonian matrix element, & the relative quantum
phase difference across the barrier.

d&/dt = qV/h

note h is Planck's quantum divided by twice pi ~ 10^-27 erg-sec

q is effective electric charge quantum leaping, i.e. teleporting,
across the barrier, V is the electrical voltage difference across the
barrier.

DC effect. Let V be a constant DC voltage V(DC), e.g. from a battery:
Feynman explains:

"First put on a DC voltage... the argument of the sine becomes &(0) +
(q/h)V(DC)t. Since h is a small number (compared to ordinary voltage and
times) the sine oscillates rather rapidly and the net current is
nothing. ... On the other hand if you have zero voltage across the
junction you can get a current! ... But try to put a voltage across it
and the current goes to zero. ... There is another way of getting a
current - by applying a voltage at a very high frequency in addition to
a DC voltage. Let

V = V(DC) + v(AC) cos wt

where v(AC) << V(DC)

then &(t) = &(0) +(q/h)V(DC)t + (q/h)(v(AC)/w) sin wt

sin(x + delta x) ~ sin x + delta x cos x

Using this approximation for sin &(t), I get

j = (2H12/h)[sin(&(0) + (q/h)V(DC)t) + (q/h)(v(AC)/w)sin wt cos (&(0) +
(q/h)V(DC)t)]

The first term is zero on the average, but the second term is not if

w = (q/h)V(DC)"

Why? From trig

cos (&(0) + (q/h)V(DC)t)] = cos &(0) cos (q/h)V(DC)t - sin &(0) sin
(q/h)V(DC)t

Therefore, the second term here multiplied by the sin wt term in j gives
a nonvanishing "in phase" integral of sin^2 wt over the oscillation
cycle when the resonance condition is obeyed.

This now connects with my PhD dissertation on Gauge Invariance in the
Theory of Superfluids (UCR, 1969) partily motivated by the work of PW
Anderson whose ideas are compiled in his later 1984 book "Basic Notions
Of Condensed Matter Physics" (Benjamin-Cummings) in particular his
paper of April 1966 I was aware of in 1968 "Considerations on the Flow
of Superfluid Helium" Rev Mod Physics 38, 298 which has the electrically
neutral analog for the AC resonance Josephson current for a general
chemical potential difference including gravity potential differences in
particular. This gets close to our Star Gate problem.

It is also curious how my two 1973 Collective Phenomena papers on
hadronic Regge plot from strong gravity "geon" tiny black holes also
fits what's happening now.

> Comments on Physics Today's article on strong short range gravity in hyperspace physics
> http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-53/iss-9/p22.html
>
> No passive spontaneous departure from G(Newton) ~ 6.67 x 10^-8 cm^3 sec^-2 g^-1 at r ~ 0.2 mm. Note I use "spontaneous" as
> distinct from active "stimulated" i.e. forced or engineered by perhaps using a gravitational AC Josephson tunneling resonance
> technique (PW Anderson) on the superfluid quantum vacuu actively forcing R to get larger adiabatically in a limited region of ordinary
> 4 dim Einstein space-time.
>
> That is,
>
> G -> G' = G| |^2 ~ G[1 + (R/r)^n]
>
> = macroscopic quantum phase coherent dilaton superfluid wave function of the mutable vacuum that "dilates" the effective
> Planck scale
>
> L(Planck) = (hG'/c)^1/2 ~ (1.6 x 10^-33 cm) (R/r)^n/2
>
> n = 7 for M-brane theory
>
> The U of Washington passive torsion balance experiment is for r ~ 0.2 mm = 0.2 x 10^-3 m = .02 cm shows that the natural R <<
> 0.2 mm.
>
> Physics Today wrote:
>
> The hierarchy problem
>
> Why all the fuss? The principal impetus was a 1998 paper entitled "The Hierarchy
> Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter"1 by particle theorists Nima
> Arkani-Hamed, Savas Dimopoulos (both then at Stanford), and Gia Dvali (then at
> Trieste, now at New York University). The hierarchy problem, simply stated, is
> the nagging question: Why is gravity so many orders of magnitude weaker than the
> other fundamental forces? The provocative answer suggested by Arkani-Hamed,
> Dimopoulos, and Dvali (ADD) supposes the existence of two or more as yet
> undetected spatial dimensions, in addition to the four dimensions of ordinary
> spacetime.
>
> But ADD were enticing experimenters with much more accessible prospects. They
> argued that the extra dimensions might be curled up on a scale as large as a few
> millimeters, making it possible to detect departures from Newtonian gravity with
> a new generation of sensitive tabletop experiments. Furthermore, they pointed out,
> the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which will be providing experimenters with 10
> TeV (104 GeV) protons by mid-decade, should also exhibit manifestations of
> these surprisingly large extra dimensions.
>
> Why should one believe in extra dimensions 32 orders of magnitude larger than the
> Planck length
>
>
> The formula (1) in the Physics Today article is consistent with my theory above.
>
>
> In effect, gravity is intrinsically comparable to the
> electroweak forces. Only its leakage into the extra dimensions makes it appear so
> much weaker to us.
>
>
> The Physics Today article implicitly points out that the effective n in my formula may not be fixed at 7 but may itself be a kind of scale
> dependent fractal dimension. I have already been aware of this additional feature.
>
>
> Trapped on the membrane
>
> What about electromagnetism and the nuclear forces, which have been probed
> down to 10­17 cm without revealing any evidence of extra dimensions? ADD
> argue that these other forces, unlike ubiquitous gravity, are restricted to the
> four-dimensional subspace (or "brane," short for membrane) on which we live.
> That makes sense in terms of string theory, which treats all the spin-1 gauge
> bosons that mediate these forces--the photon, the gluons, and the heavy weak
> bosons--as open strings, like the quarks and leptons, whose ends are stuck on our
> brane. Only the spin-2 graviton, being a closed-loop string, is free to wander off
> into the extra dimensions.
>
> This special freedom for the graviton accords with the general-relativistic
> presumption that gravity is a manifestation of spacetime geometry.
>
> Instead of uniformly rotating an attractor mass, several of the other new
> submillimeter experiments use designs in which one of the test masses is made to
> oscillate at a resonant frequency.
>
>
> Interesting variation in view of AC Josephson analogy.
>
>
> Some of the new submillimeter experiments will eventually run at cryogenic
> temperatures for greater sensitivity. To test gravity at even smaller
> separations--down to half a micrometer--a number of groups are looking for
> departures from the predicted Casimir force between conducting surfaces
> separated by a vacuum gap. Ephraim Fischbach and Dennis Krause at Purdue
> hope to test gravity at 10-nm separations by means of atomic-force microscopy.
>
>
> Good
>
>
> Abundant production of gravitons in collisions
> at these energies might manifest itself as apparent violations of energy conservation
> as the gravitons wander off in the extra dimensions. And when they do
> occasionally find their way back after a brief excursion, they might produce photon
> or lepton pairs with telltale kinematic distributions.
>
>
> This also is a clue on how the "vacuum propeller" seen in UFOs by reliable observers (mostly military) may work. One must also add
> the anholonomic torsion field to the holonomic gravity field in making these estimates.
>
>> The ADD theory predicts a "Kaluza­Klein tower" of innumerable very light excited
> states of the graviton separated from one another by mass gaps of order 10­3 eV,
> corresponding to the millimeter sizes of the extra dimensions.
>
>
> Note the low energy! We do not need super lasers! As we force R bigger than ~ millimeter up to 10 meters and even larger, the
> mass gaps get even smaller!
>
>
> The enhanced
> gravitational interaction at the TeV scale might also lead to the creation of tiny
> black holes with Schwarzschild radii on the order of 10­17 cm, which would
> quickly decay by Hawking evaporation.
>
>
> The authors are not aware that we can also make stable tiny black holes whose parameters obey the zero Hawking radiation
> holonomic constraint (Pythagorean theorem)
>
> (G'M/c^2)^2 = (J/Mc)^2 + G'(Q/c^2)^2
>
> G' = G||^2 ~ G[1 + (R/r)^n]
>
> J = angular momentum, Q = electric charge
>
> The two limiting cases are the observed astronomical Blackett and Wesson effects respectively.
>
> subject to additional anholonomic constraint corrections no one has yet worked out - a new ball game.
>
"Dr. Jack Sarfatti" wrote:

> Back to the homework problem on quantum tunneling between universes in
> the multiverse.
>
>> The vanishing determinant is then
>>
>> (H11 + hw) (H22 + hw) - H12 H21 = 0
>>
>> H11 H22 + hw (H22 + H11) + h^2w^2 - H12 H21 = 0
>>
>> For our specific problem
>>
>> H22 = 0
>>
>> So
>>
>> hw H11 + h^2w^2 - H21H12 = 0
>>
>> w^2 + w (H11/h) - (H12/h)^2 = 0
>>
>> w(+.-) = {- (H11/h) +- [(H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2]^1/2}/2
>>
>> but
>>
>> H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2
>>
>> (G^2| |^2 m^2/r) ~ (G[1 + (R/r)^n] m^2/r) = H12 = H21
>>
>> Homework Problem
>>
>> Finish computing the eigenvalues w(+) & w(-).
>>
>> Study them. What do you find?
>>
>> When are the energy eigenvalues real and distinct? When do they fuse
>> together? Can they go complex (complex roots of a polynomial)? What does
>> this solution suggest physically, if anything for our mission of Making Star
>> Trek Real?
>>
>> Find the two corresponding eigenvectors. Study them. What do you find?
>>
>> Every eigenvector of the Hamiltonian matrix Hij has an energy eigenvalue.
>> Different eigenvectors can have the same eigenvalue (degeneracy). The
>> complete set of linearly independent eigenvectors forms a "basis" or "frame
>> of reference" or "perspective" on the mental quantum bit landscape related
>> to "Hilbert space".
>>
>> Hints: see Ch 9 & Ch10 , Feynman Vol III
>>
>> To be continued.
>>
>> Find the two corresponding eigenvectors. Study them. What do you find?
>>
>> Partial Solution:
>>
>> w(+.-) = {- (H11/h) +- [(H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2]^1/2}/2
>>
>> but
>>
>> H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2
>>
>> (G^2| |^2 m^2/r) ~ (G[1 + (R/r)^n] m^2/r) = H12 = H21
>>
>> We are only interested in large hyperspace intrusion into ordinary 3 dim space, so
>> that the hyperspace control parameter for catastrophe (R. Thom-V.I. Arnold
>> singularities) generation in the dilaton superconducting phase-coherent quantum
>> vacuum of the visible 3 dim universe "bubble" we are stuck on like Flatlanders
>> (Fig 12.2. p. 256 M Kaku's Hyperspace & Aug 2000 Sci Am, p. 62), obeys
>>
>> R/r >> 1
>>
>> Therefore
>>
>> H12 ~ (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)
>>
>> G is Newton's gravity constant.
>>
>> m is the effective mass of the rotating EM field configuration forming one of the
>> Star Gate floating flat disks called "flying saucers".
>>
>
> We use Wheeler's geon solutions i.e. self-consistent nonlinear
> solitons of gravity and electromagnetic fields. They are approximate
> only for the symmetric connection. We now have a strong effective G
> over a short range. So imagine a rotating EM near field flattened
> disk-like geon as the basic "mouth" of the Star Gate in each of the
> two bubble universes of the multiverse that it connects, or,
> alternatively, connecting different parts of the same folded crumpled
> geon at different hypertimes allowing globally self-consistent
> time-travel to both past and future for that same bubble, as well as
> effective instant travel into the elsewhere of special relativity.
>
>> Note the dual roles of both R and r. They are in both ordinary and hyperspace.
>>
>> R as scale of Star Gate portal in ordinary space dual to it as scale of the unseen
>> dimensions of hyperspace. Similarly, r as the Josephson junction tunneling
>> hyperspace barrier thickness separating our visible material universe "bubble" from
>> the bubble that is the "universe next door" (RAW) it is almost tangent to dual to its
>> role as thickness of the Star Gate floating disk in ordinary space (ref: Fig 12.2. p.
>> 256 M Kaku's Hyperspace).
>>
>> Note also the electro-gravitic/magneto-gyroscopic Blackett effect for virtual
>> electric charge Q (ref.
>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/sirag-vigier3.pdfhttp://stardrive.org/Jack/wesson1.PDF,
>>
>> http://www.stardrive.org/25/
>>
>> Q ~ G^1/2 m
>>
>> (H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2
>>
>> = (m (H12/h)^2 R^2/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2
>>
>> = (m ( (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2 R^2/h)^2 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2)
>>
> = (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^4(mR^2/h)^2 [( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2
> (mR^2/h)^-2 ]
>
> Take the square root to get the discriminant of the quadratic
> equation
>
> (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^4(mR^2/h)^2[( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2
> (mR^2/h)^-2 ]^1/2
>
> Since R/r >> 1 in the strong hyperspace regime we are in, the second
> dimensionless term in the square root is small compared to 1. To first
> order in the Taylor series expansion of the square root
>
> [( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2 ]^1/2
>
> ~ [( 1 - 2(Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2 ]
>
> Therfore the small root (eigenvalue) is
>
> (EI/h) ~ (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2 = (Gm^3R^2(R/r)^n
> /r)/h^2)^-2
>
> The large root is
>
> (EII/h) ~ H11/h ~ m (Gm^2(R/r)^n /hr))^2 R^2/h
>
> It's easier to see what is going on using the abstract matrix elements
> of the Hamiltonian of this 1 qubit Star Gate between closely spaced
> bubble universes in the multiverse.
>
> ref: Feynman Vol III "Lectures on Physics" eqs. (9.26) (9.27) p. 9-7
> modified for this particular problem
>
> EI = (1/2)H11 - [(1/4)H11^2 + H12^2]^1/2
>
> EII = (1/2)H11 + [(1/4)H11^2 + H12^2]^1/2
>
> EI = (1/2)H11 - (1/2)H11[(1 + 4(H12/H11)^2]^1/2
>
> EII = (1/2)H11 + (1/2)H11[(1 + 4(H12/H11)^2]^1/2
>
> H12/H11 << 1 in the strong hyperspace region required to engineer the
> Star Gate.
>
> Therefore, from Taylor series expansion to first order in small
> quantities
>
> EI ~ (1/2)H11 - (1/2)H11[(1 + 2(H12/H11)^2] ~ H12^2/H11 << 1
>
> EII = (1/2)H11 + (1/2)H11[(1 + 2(H12/H11)^2] ~ H11 + H12^2/H11
>
> But
>
> H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2
>
> Therefore
>
> EI ~ H12^2/H11 ~ H12^2/m (H12/h)^2 R^2 ~ (1/m)(h/R)^2
>
> Note, that this small stationary energy eigenvalue of the superfluid
> quantum vacuum Star Gate is the kinetic energy of the DeBroglie
> dimension of the compactification scale of the misnamed "unseen"
> dimensions of hyperspace. However, the unseen is now being seen in ET
> UFO advanced technology. These badly named "unseen dimensions" of
> hyperspace are like the badly named "hidden variables" of Bohms
> nonlocal nonmechanical quantum realism. Neither unseen nor hidden in
> both cases when the theories are groked in their fullness.
>
> Now for the large stationary state eigenvalue of the qubit basis
> (frame of reference in the vacuum sector of the Hilbert space of the
> macroscopic superfluid quantum phase coherent Star Gate)
>
> EII ~ H11 + H12^2/H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2 + (1/m)(h/R)^2
>
> ~ m ((Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2 R^2 + (1/m)(h/R)^2
>
> OK now let's look at the two corresponding eigenvectors forming the
> stationary basis of the macroscopic superfluid quantum vacuum Star
> Gate, i.e. the independent normal modes of oscillation. Note Feynman:
>
> " we have the amplitudes for the two stationary states (the states of
> definite energy). If there are no external disturbances, a system
> initially in one of these states will stay in that state forever -
> only its phase changes" 9-7 ibid
>
> Later, when we make an AC Josephson resonance to open up the Star
> Gate, we will add a perturbation so that these states are no longer
> exact energy eigenstates.
>
> The two eigenvectors |I> & |II> (stationary energy eigenstates are)
> have two components C1 & C2 each in bubble universes |1> and |2>. It's
> easier to visualize what is going on in the Dirac bra-ket notation.
> Think of the Dirac kets |1> and |2> as the isolated quantum vacuum
> states of superfluid 3dim bubble universes 1 and 2 when far from all
> other bubble universes of the multiverse all the 3 dim bubbles
> floating in 10 dim hyperspace.
>
> C1(I) = a1(I) e^-i(/h)EIt = <1|I>e^-i(/h)EIt
>
> C2(I) = a2(I) e^-i(/h)EIt = <2|I>e^-i(/h)EIt
>
> C1(II) = a1(II) e^-i(/h)EIIt = <1|II>e^-i(/h)EIIt
>
> C2(II) = a2(II) e^-i(/h)EIIt = <2|II>e^-i(/h)EIIt
>
> Where in both cases
>
> a1/a2 = H12/(E - H11)
>
> substitute EI and EII respectively to get
>
> <1|I>/<2|I> = H12/(EI - H11)
>
> <1|II>/<2|II> = H12/(EII - H11)
>
> We also have the normalization constraints
>
> |<1|I>|^2 + |<2|I>|^2 = 1
>
> |<1|II>|^2 + |<2|II>|^2 = 1
>
> The two normal tunneling modes between bubble universes of the
> multiverse super-cosmic DC Josephson effect (prior to AC modulation)
> are
>
> |I> = |1><1|I> + |2><2|I>
>
> |II> = |1><1|II> + |2><2|II>
>
> to be continued

--
CREATE, COMMUNICATE, COLLABORATE
http://stardrive.org

Feynman's treatment of the electromagnetic AC Josephson Resonance Effect (Vol III 21-9) as the conceptual archetypal template for a macroscopic quantum Star Gate between different visible universes (or, alternatively, different parts of the same anholonomically crinkled visible universe) in the hyperspace multiverse.
Two superconducting regions 1 and 2 separated by a thin nonsuperconductingbarrier.
The superconducting tunneling current density across the barrier is
j = 2(H12/h)(<phi(1)><phi(2)>)^1/2 sin&             (21.44)
H12 the coupling Hamiltonian matrix element, & the relative quantumphase difference across the barrier.
d&/dt = qV/h
note h is Planck's quantum divided by twice pi ~ 10^-27 erg-sec
q is effective electric charge quantum leaping,  i.e. teleporting,across the barrier, V is the electrical voltage difference across the barrier.
DC effect. Let V be a constant DC voltage V(DC), e.g. from a battery:Feynman explains:
"First put on a DC voltage... the argument of the sine becomes &(0)+ (q/h)V(DC)t. Since h is a small number (compared to ordinary voltage and times) the sine oscillates rather rapidly and the net current is nothing. ... On the other hand if you have zero voltage across the junction you can get a current! ... But try to put a voltage across it and the current goes to zero. ... There is another way of getting a current - by applying a voltage at a very high frequency in addition to a DC voltage. Let
V = V(DC) + v(AC) cos wt
where v(AC) << V(DC)
then &(t) = &(0) +(q/h)V(DC)t + (q/h)(v(AC)/w) sin wt
sin(x + delta x) ~ sin x + delta x cos x
Using this approximation for sin &(t), I get
j = (2H12/h)[sin(&(0) + (q/h)V(DC)t) + (q/h)(v(AC)/w)sin wt cos(&(0) + (q/h)V(DC)t)]
The first term is zero on the average, but the second term is not if
w = (q/h)V(DC)"
Why? From trig
cos (&(0) + (q/h)V(DC)t)] = cos &(0) cos (q/h)V(DC)t - sin &(0)sin (q/h)V(DC)t
Therefore, the second term here multiplied by the sin wt term in j givesa nonvanishing "in phase" integral of sin^2 wt over the oscillation cycle when the resonance condition is obeyed.
This now connects with my PhD dissertation on Gauge Invariance in theTheory of Superfluids (UCR, 1969) partily motivated by the work of PW Anderson whose ideas are compiled in his later 1984 book "Basic Notions Of Condensed Matter Physics" (Benjamin-Cummings) in particular his  paper of April 1966 I was aware of in 1968 "Considerations on the Flow of Superfluid Helium" Rev Mod Physics 38, 298 which has the electrically neutral analog for the AC resonance Josephson current for a general chemical potential difference including gravity potential differences in particular. This gets closeto our Star Gate problem.
It is also curious how my two 1973 Collective Phenomena papers on hadronic Regge plot from strong gravity "geon" tiny black holes also fits what'shappening now.
 
 
 
 

Back to the homework problem on quantum tunneling
between universes in the multiverse.

The vanishing determinant is then

         (H11 + hw) (H22 + hw) - H12 H21 = 0

         H11 H22 + hw (H22 + H11)  + h^2w^2 - H12 H21 = 0

         For our specific problem

         H22 = 0

         So

         hw H11 + h^2w^2  - H21H12 = 0

         w^2 +  w (H11/h) - (H12/h)^2 = 0

         w(+.-)  = {- (H11/h) +-  [(H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2]^1/2}/2

         but

         H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2

         (G^2|<f>|^2 m^2/r) ~ (G[1 + (R/r)^n] m^2/r)  = H12 = H21

         Homework Problem

         Finish computing the eigenvalues w(+) & w(-).

         Study them. What do you find?

         When are the energy eigenvalues real and distinct? When do they fuse
         together? Can they go complex (complex roots of a polynomial)? What does
         this solution suggest physically, if anything for our mission of Making Star
         Trek Real?

         Find the two corresponding eigenvectors. Study them. What do you find?

         Every eigenvector of the Hamiltonian matrix Hij has an energy eigenvalue.
         Different eigenvectors can have the same eigenvalue (degeneracy). The
         complete set of linearly independent eigenvectors forms a "basis" or "frame
         of reference" or "perspective" on the mental quantum bit landscape related
         to "Hilbert space".

         Hints: see Ch 9 & Ch10 , Feynman Vol III

         To be continued.

Find the two corresponding eigenvectors. Study them. What do you find?

       Partial Solution:

       w(+.-)  = {- (H11/h) +-  [(H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2]^1/2}/2

       but

       H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2

       (G^2|<f>|^2 m^2/r) ~ (G[1 + (R/r)^n] m^2/r)  = H12 = H21

       We are only interested in large hyperspace intrusion into ordinary 3 dim space, so 
       that the hyperspace control parameter for catastrophe (R. Thom-V.I. Arnold 
       singularities) generation in the dilaton superconducting phase-coherent quantum 
       vacuum of the visible 3 dim universe "bubble" we are stuck on like Flatlanders 
       (Fig 12.2. p. 256 M Kaku's Hyperspace & Aug 2000 Sci Am, p. 62), obeys

       R/r >> 1

       Therefore

       H12 ~  (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)

       G is Newton's gravity constant.

       m is the effective mass of the rotating EM field configuration forming one of the 
       Star Gate floating flat disks called "flying saucers".

We use Wheeler's geon solutions i.e. self-consistent nonlinear solitons of gravity and electromagnetic fields. They are approximate only for the symmetric connection. We now have a strong effective G over a short range. So imagine a rotating EM near field flattened disk-like geon as the basic "mouth" of the Star Gate in each of the two bubble universes of the multiverse that it connects, or, alternatively, connecting different parts of the same folded crumpled geon at different hypertimes allowing globally self-consistent time-travel to both past and future for that same bubble, as well as effective instant travel into the elsewhere of special relativity.

       Note the dual roles of both R and r. They are in both ordinary and hyperspace.

       R as scale of Star Gate portal in ordinary space dual to it as scale of the unseen 
       dimensions of hyperspace. Similarly,  r as the Josephson junction tunneling 
       hyperspace barrier thickness separating our visible material universe "bubble" from 
       the bubble that is the "universe next door" (RAW) it is almost tangent to dual to its 
       role as thickness of the Star Gate floating disk in ordinary space (ref: Fig 12.2. p. 
       256 M Kaku's Hyperspace).

       Note also the electro-gravitic/magneto-gyroscopic  Blackett effect for virtual 
       electric charge Q (ref. 
       http://stardrive.org/Jack/sirag-vigier3.pdfhttp://stardrive.org/Jack/wesson1.PDF,

       http://www.stardrive.org/25/        Q ~ G^1/2 m

       (H11/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2

       = (m (H12/h)^2 R^2/h)^2 - 4 (H12/h)^2

       = (m ( (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2 R^2/h)^2 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2)

= (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^4(mR^2/h)^2 [( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2
(mR^2/h)^-2 ]


Take the square root to get  the discriminant of the quadratic
equation

 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^4(mR^2/h)^2[( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2
(mR^2/h)^-2 ]^1/2

Since R/r >> 1 in the strong hyperspace regime we are in, the second
dimensionless term in the square root is small compared to 1. To first
order in the Taylor series expansion of the square root

[( 1 - 4 (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2 ]^1/2

~ [( 1 - 2(Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2 ]

Therfore the small root (eigenvalue) is

(EI/h) ~ (Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^-2 (mR^2/h)^-2  = (Gm^3R^2(R/r)^n
/r)/h^2)^-2

The large root is

(EII/h) ~ H11/h ~ m (Gm^2(R/r)^n /hr))^2 R^2/h

It's easier to see what is going on using the abstract matrix elements
of the Hamiltonian of this 1 qubit Star Gate between closely spaced bubble
universes in the multiverse.

ref: Feynman Vol III "Lectures on Physics" eqs. (9.26) (9.27) p. 9-7
modified for this particular problem

EI =  (1/2)H11 -  [(1/4)H11^2 + H12^2]^1/2

EII = (1/2)H11 + [(1/4)H11^2 + H12^2]^1/2

EI =  (1/2)H11 -  (1/2)H11[(1 + 4(H12/H11)^2]^1/2

EII = (1/2)H11 +  (1/2)H11[(1 + 4(H12/H11)^2]^1/2

H12/H11 << 1 in the strong hyperspace region required to engineer
the Star Gate.

Therefore, from Taylor series expansion to first order in small quantities

EI ~ (1/2)H11 -  (1/2)H11[(1 + 2(H12/H11)^2] ~  H12^2/H11
<< 1

EII = (1/2)H11 +  (1/2)H11[(1 + 2(H12/H11)^2] ~ H11 + H12^2/H11

But

H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2

Therefore

EI  ~  H12^2/H11 ~ H12^2/m (H12/h)^2 R^2 ~  (1/m)(h/R)^2

Note, that this small stationary energy eigenvalue of the superfluid
quantum vacuum Star Gate is the kinetic energy of the DeBroglie dimension
of the compactification scale of the misnamed "unseen" dimensions of hyperspace.
However, the unseen is now being seen in ET UFO advanced technology. These
badly named "unseen dimensions" of hyperspace are like the badly named
"hidden variables" of Bohms nonlocal nonmechanical quantum realism. Neither
unseen nor hidden in both cases when the theories are groked in their fullness.

Now for the large stationary state eigenvalue of the qubit basis (frame
of reference in the vacuum sector of  the Hilbert space of the macroscopic
superfluid quantum phase coherent Star Gate)

EII ~ H11 + H12^2/H11 ~ m (H12/h)^2 R^2 + (1/m)(h/R)^2

~ m ((Gm^2(R/r)^n /r)/h)^2 R^2 + (1/m)(h/R)^2

OK now let's look at the two corresponding eigenvectors forming the
stationary basis of the macroscopic superfluid quantum vacuum Star Gate,
i.e. the independent normal modes of oscillation. Note Feynman:

" we have the amplitudes for the two stationary states (the states of
definite energy). If there are no external disturbances, a system initially
in one of these states will stay in that state forever - only its phase
changes" 9-7 ibid

Later, when we make an AC Josephson resonance to open up the Star Gate,
we will add a perturbation so that these states are no longer exact energy
eigenstates.

The two eigenvectors |I> & |II> (stationary energy eigenstates are)
have two components C1 & C2 each in bubble universes |1> and |2>. It's
easier to visualize what is going on in the Dirac bra-ket notation. Think
of the Dirac kets |1> and |2> as the isolated quantum vacuum states of
superfluid 3dim bubble universes 1 and 2 when far from all other bubble
universes of the multiverse all the 3 dim bubbles floating in 10 dim hyperspace.

C1(I) = a1(I) e^-i(/h)EIt = <1|I>e^-i(/h)EIt

C2(I) = a2(I) e^-i(/h)EIt = <2|I>e^-i(/h)EIt

C1(II) = a1(II) e^-i(/h)EIIt = <1|II>e^-i(/h)EIIt

C2(II) = a2(II) e^-i(/h)EIIt = <2|II>e^-i(/h)EIIt

Where in both cases

a1/a2 = H12/(E - H11)

substitute EI and EII respectively to get

<1|I>/<2|I> = H12/(EI - H11)

<1|II>/<2|II> = H12/(EII - H11)

We also have the normalization constraints

|<1|I>|^2 + |<2|I>|^2 = 1

|<1|II>|^2 + |<2|II>|^2 = 1

The two normal tunneling modes between bubble universes of the multiverse
super-cosmic DC Josephson effect (prior to AC modulation) are

|I> = |1><1|I> + |2><2|I>

|II> = |1><1|II> + |2><2|II>

to be continued

Why are "extraterrestrial intelligences" often characterized as reptilian, and as being negative or evil ? I do not censor the perceptions of those who have asserted the existence of these creatures. My research simply causes me to question the origin of the "reptilian" image. Previous to the neo-tech information era and our probing into the universe beyond our planet, the "devil" and "demons" were often depicted as being reptilian in form. I have written about aspects of the traditional "supernatural" in my books DARK FRONTIER and DR. FU MAN CHU MEETS THE LONESOME COWBOY: SORCERY & THE UFO EXPERIENCE .Both of these works are now available on Amazon.com or through info@fluidice.com.

Yet I know there is much to learn beyond these chthonic correspondences. The following page 109 was written in 1977. I was trying to express a fundamental perception that the "intelligence" behind the "ufo sighting" which had sparked my book CONGRATULATIONS: THE UFO REALITY was not "from" my so-called reptilian lower brain at the base of my skull. Yet at that time I had nothing to offer on that subject but my intuition. Since my initial rejection of the idea that ET perceptions are an atavistic & "reptilian" function, I have read accounts of a variety of contacts with humans by "humanoid" beings who resemble people but tell their interlocutors that they are actually chemically and structurally different from human beings. I have also included in the "Artifact Arcade" section of my book DARK FRONTIER photographs of "intelligences" which appeared on my film in New York City and London. These "intelligences" are in the form of people but with slight differences of appearance and ability.

It is possible that such "intelligences" do mingle more easily in crowded cities where they are less likely to be noticed as different.

HERE REFER BACK TO "LIVING CREATURES" PAGE .(Click category above.)

THE FIRST SEND OF VIDEO MENTIONED HERE BELOW WAS NOT ABLE TO BE VIEWED. 

WAS THIS. BECAUSE  "FLUIDICE" FLUX THROUGH  THE LEWIS HOLLOW PHOTO

WHICH WAS SUBSEQUENTLY USED SUCCESSFULLY INSTEAD

  CAUSED THE PREVIOUS NON-FUNCTION OF THE FIRST-SENT VIDEO CLIP?

Subj: Reality of virtual image & mini-video clip
Date: 3/2/00 5:18:03 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: MagickMirr
To: rnboyd@mip.net

File: 3-2-00 5'10'21 PM.EXE (1033239 bytes)
DL Time (49333 bps): < 6 minutes

In a message dated 3/2/00 9:30:03 AM Eastern Standard Time, rnboyd@mip.net writes:

<< , in the standard view, it is held that there is a
> flow of "virtual particles"
> into, and out of the region of the elemental particle. This
> flux density increases
> in the vicinity of discrete atoms of matter. It is
> conceivable that this virtual
> flux is not virtual, but actual! >>
Hi Neil--
About nine years ago, I presented a paper on the reality of virtual image in a mirror or lens for the New Science Forum in Fort Collins, Colorado. With diagrams & illustrations!
Let me know what happens when you focus on the attached video.
--E.Macer-Story 2000

Paper on the reality of virtual image available from info@fluidice.com. Cost is $30.